(4.6/5)
Manatal is robust and user-friendly hiring software designed for small and medium-sized businesses. With a starting price of just $15 per user per month, it offers an affordable and accessible solution for automating the recruitment process. The platform has advanced features such as AI-powered candidate filtering, which helps quickly identify the most suitable candidates based on job descriptions. Its intuitive drag-and-drop pipelines make organizing and managing candidate workflows easy, while it helps send mass email campaigns to enhance communication efficiency.
Additionally, the software provides multi-language support for career pages, allowing businesses to cater to diverse candidate pools. The software also includes a built-in referral management system, enabling users to track and manage candidate referrals easily. With its comprehensive tools and easy-to-navigate interface, Manatal is an invaluable asset for recruitment teams aiming to streamline their hiring processes and improve overall candidate engagement.
Advantages
- Affordable Pricing
- Multi-Language Support
- Drag-and-Drop Pipelines
- Built-In Referral Management
- Email Signature Customization
- AI-Powered Candidate Filtering
Disadvantages
- No Free Plan
- No Email Scheduling
- Referral Program Tracking
- Inability to Combine Search Methods
Summary
Comments
Manatal’s AI recommendations made updating candidate profiles easy. The Profile Enrichment feature pulled data from social media, saving us a lot of time. It was a must-have for any HR team.
The Profile Enrichment feature in Manatal saved us a lot of time. We got updated info from LinkedIn and GitHub with just a click, reducing manual work. This automation boosted our productivity.
Manatal’s drag-and-drop pipelines and referral management system simplified our recruitment process. Organizing candidates and tracking referrals was easy, even for beginners.
Manatal’s AI-powered filtering was great for quickly finding top candidates in English resumes. It wasn’t perfect for non-English resumes, but it was still better than other tools we had used.
